How it works
One login, all agents, zero switching.
Integrations
Soon3,000+ apps: Slack, HubSpot, Jira, Gmail, and more.
Security & trust
SoonBank-level encryption, SOC 2 Type II.

Hire AI employees that never sleep, never miss, never quit.
20x
team productivity
$37K
saved / 500 users
Blog
Playbooks, guides & AI insights.
Help center & docs
SoonSetup guides & API reference.
Webinars & demos
SoonLive sessions & recordings.
Sigi reads every clause in your contract and generates smart improvement suggestions based on contract type, industry context, and legal best practices. Weak clauses get flagged with stronger alternatives drafted to fit. Every recommendation comes with rationale, so the team knows exactly why each change matters.

Sigi reads every clause, analyses with industry context, flags weak language, recommends stronger alternatives with rationale.

Full Contract Read
Not the obvious provisions, every single clause. Indemnification, warranties, payment terms, termination, intellectual property, confidentiality, force majeure, assignment, governing law, and everything else. The full clause inventory gets reviewed, not just the headline provisions a quick manual scan would catch.

Context Aware Analysis
A payment term that's standard for a service agreement is weak for a high value vendor contract. Sigi considers the contract type, the industry, and the legal best practices for that specific combination. Suggestions reflect the actual context rather than generic templates that ignore what kind of deal this is.

Weak Language Flagged
Vague language, missing protections, asymmetric terms, ambiguous wording. Sigi flags the weak clauses and provides stronger alternatives drafted to fit the specific contract. Not boilerplate substitutes but language adapted to the parties, the subject matter, and the existing structure of the document.

Rationale Included
Replace this clause with that one is not enough for legal review. Sigi explains why each change matters, what the current weakness is, and what the stronger version protects against. The reasoning lets the team make an informed decision rather than accepting suggestions blindly.
Every clause reviewed, every weak one flagged, every recommendation drafted for the specific contract, every change explained. The team's signed contracts stop being acceptable and start being excellent.
Manual review tends to focus on the headline provisions and skim the rest. Systematic clause review catches the weak language in provisions nobody pays much attention to until they actually matter. The full contract gets the same scrutiny, not just the parts that feel important on first read.
What counts as a strong clause varies by contract type and industry. A payment term standard for service work is weak for a high value vendor agreement. Sigi considers the actual context rather than applying generic template language that ignores what kind of deal this is.
Boilerplate substitutes that don't match the contract's existing structure create awkward seams and require extra rework. Sigi drafts stronger alternatives adapted to the parties, the subject matter, and the surrounding clauses. Drop in ready for the legal team's review.
A recommendation without reasoning forces the legal team to figure out whether to accept it or reject it. Sigi explains the current weakness, what the stronger version protects against, and why the change is worth making. Informed decisions instead of blind acceptance or blanket rejection.
Manual review by even the best legal counsel produces inconsistent quality across high contract volumes. Systematic clause intelligence raises the floor on every contract the team signs, so the worst contract this quarter is still meaningfully better than the average contract last quarter.
Clause Intelligence improves the clauses that exist. Risk Analysis flags problematic clauses. Missing Clause Detection catches absent ones. Together the three Sigi review features cover every category of contract review problem in one platform.
Every clause reviewed in context. Weak language flagged with stronger alternatives. Rationale included for every recommendation. The clause intelligence layer your contract review has always needed.
7800+
Teams turning every contract into their best one
In house legal counsel raising the bar across high contract volumes who cannot manually achieve consistent strengthening on every document. Founders signing high value deals who want stronger terms than the counterparty's first draft offers. Procurement teams strengthening vendor agreements before they go to signature. Contract managers establishing higher standards across the team's contract library. Any team that has signed a contract and later realised the language could have been stronger.
Reviewed
Aware Context
Language
Provided
Sigi reads every clause in the contract, not just the headline provisions. Each clause gets analysed against the contract type, the industry context, and the legal best practices for that specific combination. Systematic review rather than selective spot checks.

Full contract clause review, contract type awareness, industry context, weak clause flagging, stronger alternative drafting, rationale for every recommendation.
Every clause in the contract gets reviewed, not just the headline provisions. Indemnification, warranties, payment terms, termination, intellectual property, confidentiality, and everything else. Systematic coverage, no skipped sections.
What's strong for a service agreement differs from what's strong for a vendor contract or an employment agreement. Sigi considers the contract type first and applies the standards appropriate for that specific category.
Industry shapes what counts as standard, strong, or weak. Software contracts differ from manufacturing contracts differ from professional services. Sigi factors in the industry context so suggestions reflect the actual deal rather than generic legal templates.
Vague language, missing protections, asymmetric terms, ambiguous wording. The categories of weakness most likely to cost the team something get flagged explicitly with a clear explanation of what makes the clause weak.
Every flagged clause comes with a stronger alternative drafted to fit. Not boilerplate substitutes but language adapted to the parties, the subject matter, and the surrounding clauses. Drop in ready for legal review.
Every recommendation includes rationale explaining the current weakness, what the stronger version protects against, and why the change matters. Informed decisions rather than blind acceptance or blanket rejection.
Every clause in the contract gets reviewed, not just the headline provisions. Indemnification, warranties, payment terms, termination, intellectual property, confidentiality, and everything else. Systematic coverage, no skipped sections.
What's strong for a service agreement differs from what's strong for a vendor contract or an employment agreement. Sigi considers the contract type first and applies the standards appropriate for that specific category.
Industry shapes what counts as standard, strong, or weak. Software contracts differ from manufacturing contracts differ from professional services. Sigi factors in the industry context so suggestions reflect the actual deal rather than generic legal templates.
Vague language, missing protections, asymmetric terms, ambiguous wording. The categories of weakness most likely to cost the team something get flagged explicitly with a clear explanation of what makes the clause weak.
Every flagged clause comes with a stronger alternative drafted to fit. Not boilerplate substitutes but language adapted to the parties, the subject matter, and the surrounding clauses. Drop in ready for legal review.
Every recommendation includes rationale explaining the current weakness, what the stronger version protects against, and why the change matters. Informed decisions rather than blind acceptance or blanket rejection.
Common questions about weak clauses, industry context, the rationale, overrides, and how this differs from the other Sigi review features.
Vague language, missing protections, asymmetric terms, ambiguous wording. The categories of weakness that historically cost teams something when contracts get tested. A vague payment term that doesn't specify late fees. An indemnification clause that's heavy on one side. A termination provision that lacks the cure period the team's standards usually include. Each weakness gets named explicitly with a clear explanation.
Every clause reviewed in context. Weak language flagged with stronger alternatives. Rationale included for every recommendation. The clause intelligence layer your contract review has always deserved.
Turn a contract into a signed, audited document in minutes while AI flags risky clauses before they reach your signer.