Catch the risky clause before
it's already signed.
Sigi reads every contract you send through it. One-sided indemnity, missing liability caps, absent termination clauses — flagged with severity ratings before the document reaches a signer. Every signature lands in a tamper-evident audit chain you can hand to opposing counsel without flinching.
Risk Review Queue
Master Services Agreement · Vandelay
Liability cap removed in counter-redline · review
Statement of Work · Pied Piper
No termination clause detected · suggest insert
Mutual NDA · Stark Industries
Indemnity is one-sided · review
Data Processing Addendum · Hooli
Standard template · no flags · ready to send
You're the last line of defense. And the first one blamed.
Counter-redlines slip through unread
Vendor sends a redlined draft late on Friday. By Monday it's already in the signature queue. The liability cap they quietly removed becomes a problem six months later, in a deposition.
You can't review every clause on every contract
The business signs hundreds of agreements a quarter. You catch the big ones. The small ones — NDAs, vendor orders, change requests — go through unread. The risk hides in the long tail.
Audit response is a fire drill
When the auditor asks for evidence of who signed what and when, you spend the day in email and shared drives. The proof is "we have a PDF". Real tamper-evidence needs hashes, IPs, and a chain.
Sigi reads every contract. Flags every risk. Chains every signature.Risk caught at draft. Evidence sealed at sign.
One-sided indemnity, missing liability caps, unusual penalties, asymmetric termination rights — all surfaced with severity ratings before the document moves. Critical flags fire realtime alerts so high-stakes contracts pause for review automatically.
- Severity-rated flags: critical, high, medium, low
- Realtime notification on critical and high flags
- Auto-resolve on completion or expiry
For every contract type, AI gap-analyzes against what that contract should contain. No termination clause? Flagged. No governing law? Flagged. No force majeure? Flagged. The small contracts you can't review by hand get a baseline second read.
- Gap analysis on every document type
- Clause Intelligence suggests improved language
- Provider-switchable (Groq or Ollama) per feature
Build a Blueprint for every recurring contract — MSA, NDA, DPA, SOW. Collaborators submit edit requests, admins approve or reject. Use-count tracked per Blueprint so you see which templates carry the org. Your standard language stays standard.
- Edit-request workflow with admin approval
- Pre-configured roles and field positions
- Per-template use_count tracking
Three flows the contracts desk runs every day.
A second set of eyes on every contract
Even when you can't personally review the NDA going out at 5pm, AI does. One-sided indemnity, missing caps, unusual penalty clauses — flagged at upload, surfaced on the doc detail page, escalated by severity. The contracts you would have skimmed get a real review.
Numbers from real contracts desks.
I used to spend my Sundays reading vendor redlines. Sigi reads them on Friday afternoon, flags what changed, and I walk into Monday already knowing where to push back.
— Head of Legal, Series C SaaS
0
AI features on every contract
0
Severity levels surfaced
0
Workflow types supported
0%
Tamper-evident audit coverage
In-house, outside counsel, or solo GC.
In-house Legal
You run the contracts desk for a 300-person company. AI risk review covers what you can't personally read. Blueprints lock in your standard language. Audit chain handles compliance.
Outside Counsel
Run a client's contracts workflow without giving them direct access. Templates per client, audit trail per matter, signing certificates that satisfy bar standards.
Compliance Officer
Policy distribution by acknowledgement workflow. Attested-view evidence that the employee actually opened the document. Retention auto-enforced.
Solo General Counsel
One lawyer, the whole company's paper. AI takes the load on the long tail. You handle the contracts that actually need your judgment.
What contracts teams ask before they put their name on a tool.
How is Sigi different from DocuSign or Adobe Sign?
DocuSign and Adobe Sign route paper. Sigi reads it too. Four AI features run on every document: risk detection on clauses, gap analysis on missing clauses, language suggestions while drafting, and behavior analysis on signers. On top of that, Sigi lives inside the WorksBuddy suite — Lio deals push contracts in, Taro picks up follow-up tasks on stalled docs, Inzo invoices on completion. You get the e-sign primitive plus the AI plus the native automation, in one product.
What workflow types does Sigi support?
How does the AI risk detection actually work?
Is the audit trail actually tamper-evident?
How does the Lio, Taro, and Inzo integration work?
What about signers without a Sigi account?
Catch the risky clause before it's signed.
See AI risk flags, missing-clause detection, and the SHA-256 audit chain in a 30-minute demo.